Ladies and gentlemen, the system is such that people interact with ChatGPT in a simple way, ask a „primitive“ question and expect SOMETHING to answer with Google. However, ChatGPT, for example, must be used by focusing on so-called in-depth research (the best features) in the pro version, exploring any topic outside the computer, and only when you have a really thoughtful question, you incorporate all the variables in addition to your own thoughts. This means that ChatGPT does not behave like a mere search engine for primitive simplest answers as in a normal query, but the more sophisticated the question, the more ChatGPT answers in depth, of course, I consistently pay attention to dividing the resulting study into an academic, carefully sourced version from a professional point of view, but I always have an answer prepared from a non-professional point of view outside of professional answers, And before asking a question, I also work out a style of answering, an analysis, a fictitious interview about a question, or an examination of a problem from all scientific disciplines, I have more variants, depending on the complexity of the question. The result of an in-depth analysis or other final project is the mapping of the problem from twelve points of view. Of course, then I read the resulting study carefully and at the same time write down the questions that need to be asked again to get to the bottom line. I can send you one such example – ChatGPT is not just GOOGLE but an extremely sophisticated tool, but the mistake is usually that people use it as a primitive GOOGLE, which absolutely destroys the possibilities that ChatGPT has. Honestly, I am able to handle any topic, especially from points of view that I would not even think of when assigned.

Addition to the definition of an objective opinion: You are right about that, and it can often happen that even though I have an objective analysis in my hand, after careful professional reading I find that some parts of the answers are in conflict with the whole, and I check those parts again, the result is then, because I have an academic one, that I am able to contact a person from the other side of the planet to verify sources, who expressed concern about the result of the analysis and finds new mistakes – for example, honestly, I am analyzing one religion that presents itself as an interesting spiritual path and purposefully, really purposefully, destroys any negative information about its group from Wikipedia to the point where it creates its own Wikipedia as if to order, where it has all the information modified. Well, I will get to those who have studied this group before the targeted deletion of bad or even disgusting ways of behaving, and I get through all the most beautiful information, for example, to the core where strangers wrote a set of professional publications before the information was erased (even though it remains in archive.org), in which the information is found before the modification of the religious institution, which really took the targeted work to delete the other, inconvenient information so that they would eliminate any mention in the Internet environment – so I will have the originals of the writings and publications that were suppressed sent to me. I can really communicate with people from abroad and I get information that no one in the Czech Republic can find out even over the Internet.